WASHINGTON (AFP) — The screams of pink-clad female protestors could be heard but General David Petraeus could not. The US commander in Iraq had a dud microphone.
What was billed as the most electrifying day of testimony in Congress for many years lurched into farce Monday as Petraeus struggled to be heard and members of the anti-war group Code Pink were dragged kicking from the room.
"I'll bet (Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-) Maliki's sitting there watching this and thinking, 'at least my mike works'," one congressional staffer was heard to grumble.
The audio failure seemed all too apposite for anti-war campaigners who accuse President George W. Bush of turning a deaf ear to the groundswell of US opinion that wants the Iraq adventure to come to an end.
At least seven hecklers, including prominent anti-war campaigner, Cindy Sheehan were hustled out of the committee room and arrested by police, with one Code Pink woman screaming "I have a right to speak out! This is not Russia!"
The technological gremlins eventually fixed and order restored, the US military's top counterinsurgency expert got down to business explaining why Congress should give him more time to pacify the bloodstained nation.
But his message was already at risk of being drowned out as opposing camps square off over what is probably the most emotive debate to engulf the United States since the Vietnam War.
Before she was evicted, Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin said that Petraeus was "nothing but a messenger for the White House," echoing the left-wing group MoveOn.org's denunciation of "General Betray US."
"We've had the wool pulled over our eyes right from the start of this war. We're sick of the lies and want our troops home," she said, proudly leading Code Pink's self-confessed contingent of "rabble rousers" into battle.
But the cerebral Petraeus, who has a doctorate in international relations from Princeton University, remained unflappable as he laid out the "devastating consequences" that would erupt from an abrupt US exit from Iraq.
Like the meticulous soldier he is, Petraeus entered the room a full hour before the hearing was due to start for a quick survey of the impending field of combat.
"I'm here on recon," he told startled photographers who rushed to grab a shot during his brief look-see.
The excitement surrounding the rare joint session of the House of Representatives Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees threatened to drown out the dispassionate tones of Baghdad envoy Ryan Crocker.
When it was the US ambassador's turn to speak after Petraeus, fidgeting set in and Blackberries came out among the 200-plus people present for the hearing in the Cannon House Building's richly decorated Caucus Room.
It was the most hotly anticipated appearance in Congress by a US commander since General William Westmoreland addressed a joint session of the House and Senate in 1967 to argue that his strategy in Vietnam was "producing results."
Other parallels in history were invoked in defense of US strategy today in the infant democracy of Iraq.
Republican Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said the enemies of Iraq's government were "enemies of democracies everywhere," with whom it was impossible to compromise.
British prime minister Neville Chamberlain had tried to appease Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, but "only ensured that an immensely larger threat was unleashed," she said.
Geoff Millard, a 26-year-old former sergeant with the army's 42nd Infantry Division who served in Iraq in 2004 and 2005, insisted that Vietnam and not World War II was the relevant analogy as he spoke out against the war.
"Westmoreland came to Congress and said 'we need more troops and more time.' Well, we don't have more troops or more time for Iraq," he said.
"Petraeus isn't here to represent the soldiers. He's here to represent the Bush administration agenda. They talk about progress in Iraq. Well here's the progress: we're pissing people off and creating more terrorists."
Copyright © 2009 AFP. All rights reserved. More »
